Biblical View of Tongues
1
Corinthians 12-14
Andrew R. Rappaport
There
is much confusion in some Christian circle over an issue of some of the gifts
of the Holy Spirit regarding the speaking of tongues. The gift of speaking in tongues is the miraculous
ability to speak a known human language that the speaker did not previously
know. There are some that view that the
gift of speaking in tongues is an non-human language. We will address where that comes from and why
it is not true. However, Acts 2:5-13,
which is the first instance of tongues in the New Testament, clearly explains
that the tongues where human languages.
In fact the languages are listed, in Acts 2:8-11:
And how is it that we hear, each in our
own language in which we were born? Parthians and Medes and Elamites, those
dwelling in Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and
Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya adjoining Cyrene, visitors from Rome,
both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabs—we hear them speaking in our own
tongues the wonderful works of God.
Much
of the tongues speaking is found in the emotionalism of the Charismatic
movement. The current movement sees
tongues as a most important gift with such a great priority that everyone
should seek after it and all should strive to speak in tongues. They also teach that it is a gift from God to
edify one’s self. To learn about a
Biblical view of tongues and their user we need to look in the Bible not
ourselves. Acts 2 is not instruction on
tongues but only details of an event involving tongues. The clearest and only teaching on the issue
of tongues is Paul’s instructions in 1 Corinthians 12-14. Much of the current tongues speaking movement
is rooted in a misunderstanding of these chapters. A careful evaluation of these chapters reveal
that neither Paul nor God would endorse the current movement. Paul will express that 1) there should be a diversity of gifts, 2) the priority of gifts
is not tongues as related to its importance and that 3) the purpose of gifts
are for the edification of the church, not one’s own self.
1Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I do not want you to be ignorant:
2You know that
you were Gentiles, carried away to these dumb idols, however you were led. 3Therefore I
make known to you that no one speaking by the Spirit of God calls Jesus
accursed, and no one can say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit.
4There are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. 5There are
differences of ministries, but the same Lord. 6And there are diversities of activities, but
it is the same God who works all in all. 7But the manifestation of the Spirit is given
to each one for the profit of all: 8for to one is given the word of wisdom through
the Spirit, to another the word of knowledge through the same Spirit, 9to another
faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healings by the same Spirit, 10to another the
working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another discerning of spirits, to
another different kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. 11But one and
the same Spirit works all these things, distributing to each one individually
as He wills.
12For as the body is one and has many members, but all the members of that
one body, being many, are one body, so also is Christ. 13For by one
Spirit we were all baptized into one body— whether Jews or Greeks, whether
slaves or free—and have all been made to drink into one Spirit. 14For in fact
the body is not one member but many.
15If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand, I am not of the body,” is
it therefore not of the body? 16And if the ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I am not of the body,”
is it therefore not of the body? 17If the whole body were an eye, where would be
the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where would be the smelling? 18But now God
has set the members, each one of them, in the body just as He pleased. 19And if they
were all one member, where would the body be?
20But now indeed there are many members, yet one body. 21And the eye
cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you”; nor again the head to the
feet, “I have no need of you.” 22No, much rather, those members of the body which seem to be weaker are
necessary. 23And those members of the body which we think to be less honorable, on these
we bestow greater honor; and our unpresentable parts have greater modesty, 24but our
presentable parts have no need. But God composed the body, having given greater
honor to that part which lacks it, 25that there should be no schism in the body,
but that the members should have the same care for one another. 26And if one
member suffers, all the members suffer with it; or if one member is honored,
all the members rejoice with it.
27Now you are
the body of Christ, and members individually. 28And God has appointed these in the church:
first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then
gifts of healings, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues. 29Are all
apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles? 30Do all have
gifts of healings? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? 31But earnestly
desire the best gifts. And yet I show you a more excellent way. (1
Corinthians 12:1-31)
In
the current charismatic movement, tongues are almost a necessity for every
believer as a sign of spiritual maturity called a “second blessing” or with
some even a sign of salvation. There is
great emphasis on encouraging all
believers to strive for the speaking of tongues. The Corthians had the same problem. They were all seeking to claim to speak in
tongues, heal people and do miracles, but the greatest emphasis was on tongues
and that is why Paul had to address the issue with the Corinthians. However, Paul goes through great lengths to
prove that tongues is a lesser gift to be seeking and not all believers or even
most believers would have this gift. The
seeking of a gift itself is wrong; God commands believers to pursue love, not
gifts (14:1). God gives spiritual gifts
at the point of salvation and after we may discover them, not seek after them.
In
1 Corinthians 12, Paul makes the point that not all believers have the same gifts.
Paul lists many gifts and explains the diversity of gifts. Paul uses the example of the church as the
body of Christ. In this example, Paul
points out that each member of the body must
have a different function. The reason for a diversity of gifts is due to
diversity in function. A body needs
different members to have different functions or else the whole body will not
function properly. Therefore, if all members sought the same gift, then
they would seek the same function and as Paul says, “if the whole body were an
eye, where would be the hearing?”
(v. 17). Everyone in the body
should have a diversity of gifts and not the same.
Paul
spends time in verses 14-26 explaining that believers need to be content with
the giftedness that they have and not
to be seeking gifts that they do not have, i.e. tongues. Each member of the body must be content with
their own gifts in order that the diversity of gifts within the body will
function properly. No one in the body
should be critical of another’s giftedness, because all are necessary. Moreover, no one should expect that everyone
should have the same gift, such as tongues.
If God gives spiritual gifts to a member of the body, it is because He
knows that it is necessary for the functioning of that body. However, the current Charismatic movement
places pressure on most, if not all, believers to have one specific gift,
speaking in tongues. The Charismatic
movement is wrong to encourage anyone to try to speak in tongues. Either God gives the gift at salvation or He
does not, but no one should be seeking the “gift”.
Further,
we see that Paul does not place a priority on tongues as the Charismatic
movement does. Paul states that God has
appointed certain gifts in an order 1) apostles (sent ones), 2) prophets
(preachers) and 3) teachers. He states
after these three (all of which involve speaking in the common language) come
other gifts: miracles, healings, helps, administration and lastly tongues. If tongues were something so important that all believers should strive for it then
why is it mentioned last? This does not
appear to be a priority Paul clearly states that apostles, prophets and
teachers are a priority.
1Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I
have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. 2And though I
have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and
though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I
am nothing. 3And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my
body to be burned, but have not love, it profits me nothing.
4Love suffers long and is kind; love does not envy; love does not parade
itself, is not puffed up; 5does not behave rudely, does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no
evil; 6does not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth; 7bears all
things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
8Love never fails. But whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether
there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish
away. 9For we know in part and we prophesy in part. 10But when that
which is perfect has come, then that which is in part will be done away.
11When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought
as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things. 12For now we see
in a mirror, dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I shall
know just as I also am known.
13And now abide faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is
love.
1Pursue love,
and desire spiritual gifts, but especially that you may prophesy. (1 Corinthians 13:1-14:1)
Paul
compares tongues to love in chapter 13. So
many people focus on the description of love in this chapter that they forget
the context of it is a comparison between love and tongues to prove a priority to
seek for in the believer’s life. Paul
just completed stating that there should be a diversity of gifts and no one
should seek after a spiritual gift. Now
since, the Corinthians believe that everyone should have one spiritual gift,
Paul compares it to something that every Christian should seek after,
love. In this comparison, love is
eternal and tongues are temporal, showing the importance and priority of love
over tongues. Paul must discuss this
because the Corinthians were using their “gift of tongues” to prove a sign of
spirituality, it was spiritual pride.
They were not showing
love. Paul spends the time to set them
straight saying love is more important then tongues. However, for many in the Charismatic movement
today, they share in the Corinthian problem.
Since Charismatic’s say that tongues are the sign of the “second
blessing”, it is therefore a test of one’s spirituality. If one does not speak in tongues, they are
seen as not being indwelt with the Holy Spirit nor mature in the faith. However, according to Paul, the test of
spirituality is love (something all believers should have), not tongues
(something that only some believers should have).
Paul
being sarcastic uses hyperbolic statements to contrast love and tongues. He states that if there was a language of angels and he spoke it but did not have
love then he is nothing but a noise maker (v. 1). Many in the Charismatic movement use verse 1
to prove that they speak some angelic language not known to man. However, if Paul is taken literally in verse
1 he should also be taken literally in verse 2.
Therefore, when Paul claims to “understand
all mysteries” and have “all
knowledge” we must assume that Paul is God, having the attribute of
omniscience (something only God can have).
It is clear that Paul is not claiming to be God, but using hyperbole to
make the clearest contrast possible.
Paul uses hyperbole to exaggerate in order to make a clear
contrast. This contrast is made so that
the reader would see that love is greater than tongues and faith is greater
than prophecy. As for the argument that
tongues are an angelic language, many in the Charismatic movement overlook
Paul’s statement when he speaks of tongues in reference to a “language in the world” (v. 14:10).
After
Paul provides a description of the love that he is talking about, he returns to
the discussion of spiritual gifts. Paul
states that tongues will cease, but that love is eternal and will never cease. There is some question as to what “that which is perfect” (v.10) refers. However, the three illustrations which Paul
uses: 1) understand as a child, 2) seeing in a mirror dimly and 3) knowing in
part, all refer to something that is immature or incomplete compared to something
that is matured or completed. Since, the
word for “perfect” can mean complete
or mature as well as “perfect”, it is better interpreted as something completed
or matured, not something that is in a state of perfection. Therefore, this is not a reference to Christ,
because He is perfect. It is better to
interpret the “perfect” thing that
causes tongues to cease as either the church or the Bible. It is best seen as referring to the
completion of the writing of the Canon (the Bible), because all of the things
that stop (prophecies, tongues and knowledge) are all revelatory gifts. After the completion of the Canon, there is
no more need for these other gifts.
Not
only would tongues cease when the Canon was completed, but Paul again states
that faith, hope and love are the greatest of gifts and the greatest of these
three is love (v.13). Furthermore, Paul
commands us to “pursue love”
(14:1). While many in the Charismatic
movement encourage one another to pursue or seek to speak in tongues, God never
makes that suggestion. However, He
commands us to seek love. The contrast
is clear. Love is the priority and
should be pursued, not tongues. It is
wrong to encourage the pursuit of tongues speaking.
Paul
clearly believes that love is the priority of the Christian. The problem in the Corinthian church was that
they were seeking selfishness and not love.
They used tongues as a spiritual pride to prove themselves more
spiritual then one another. The current
Charismatic church does the same often.
The speaking of tongues is for selfish reasons. They state that the speaking of tongues is
often in some unknown language for the purpose of self-edification. Paul would say to love is greater. Love is the priority and not tongues. Now he addresses the purpose of spiritual gifts.
2For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one
understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries. 3But he who
prophesies speaks edification and exhortation and comfort to men. 4He who speaks
in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church. 5I wish you all
spoke with tongues, but even more that you prophesied; for he who prophesies is
greater than he who speaks with tongues, unless indeed he interprets, that the
church may receive edification.
6But now, brethren, if I come to you speaking with tongues, what shall I
profit you unless I speak to you either by revelation, by knowledge, by
prophesying, or by teaching? 7Even things without life, whether flute or harp, when they make a sound,
unless they make a distinction in the sounds, how will it be known what is
piped or played? 8For if the trumpet makes an uncertain sound, who will prepare for battle? 9So likewise
you, unless you utter by the tongue words easy to understand, how will it be
known what is spoken? For you will be speaking into the air. 10There are, it
may be, so many kinds of languages in the world, and none of them is without
significance. 11Therefore, if I do not know the meaning of the language, I shall be a
foreigner to him who speaks, and he who speaks will be a foreigner to me. 12Even so you,
since you are zealous for spiritual gifts, let it be for the edification of the
church that you seek to excel.
13Therefore let him who speaks in a tongue pray that he may interpret. 14For if I pray
in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my understanding is unfruitful. 15What is the
conclusion then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will also pray with the
understanding. I will sing with the spirit, and I will also sing with the
understanding. 16Otherwise, if you bless with the spirit, how will he who occupies the place
of the uninformed say “Amen” at your giving of thanks, since he does not
understand what you say? 17For you indeed give thanks well, but the other is not edified.
18I thank my God I speak with tongues more than you all; 19yet in the
church I would rather speak five words with my understanding, that I may teach
others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue.
20Brethren, do not be children in understanding; however, in malice be babes,
but in understanding be mature.
21In the law it
is written: “With men of other tongues and other lips I will speak to this
people; And yet, for all that, they will not hear Me,” says the Lord.
22Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to
unbelievers; but prophesying is not for unbelievers but for those who believe. 23Therefore if
the whole church comes together in one place, and all speak with tongues, and
there come in those who are uninformed or unbelievers, will they not say that
you are out of your mind? 24But if all prophesy, and an unbeliever or an uninformed person comes in, he
is convinced by all, he is convicted by all. 25And thus the secrets of his heart are
revealed; and so, falling down on his face, he will worship God and report that
God is truly among you.
26How is it then, brethren? Whenever you come together, each of you has a
psalm, has a teaching, has a tongue, has a revelation, has an interpretation.
Let all things be done for edification. 27If anyone speaks in a tongue, let there be two
or at the most three, each in turn, and let one interpret. 28But if there
is no interpreter, let him keep silent in church, and let him speak to himself
and to God. 29Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge. 30But if
anything is revealed to another who sits by, let the first keep silent. 31For you can
all prophesy one by one, that all may learn and all may be encouraged. 32And the
spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. 33For God is not
the author of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints.
34Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to
speak; but they are to be submissive, as the law also says. 35And if they
want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is
shameful for women to speak in church.
36Or did the word of God come originally from you? Or was it you only that it
reached? 37If anyone thinks himself to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge
that the things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord. 38But if anyone
is ignorant, let him be ignorant.
39Therefore,
brethren, desire earnestly to prophesy, and do not forbid to speak with
tongues. 40Let all things be done decently and in order. (1 Corinthians 14:2-40)
Many
today claim that tongues are for the believers to edify themselves. This is not taught in Scripture! Paul states that anyone that speaks in
tongues, without interpretation, speaks to God and edifies himself or herself
(vs. 2-4). The current Charismatic’s use
these verses to support their case. In
the context of the chapter, Paul lays out this as a condemnation, not an
instruction. The clearest proof o this
statement is in verse 14, “for if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my
understanding is unfruitful”. Paul is using the Corinthian view of
self-edification as a proof of how it is wrong, so he first quotes the view
then discredits it not indorses it. Paul
again is being sarcastic. The rest of
chapter explains the purpose of spiritual gifts, specifically tongues. They are for the edification of the body, not one’s self. Paul must give instructions to the
Corinthians because of their gross misuse of tongues.
He
shows how tongues without interpretation is useless. This is the most common use of tongues
today. Most often tongues are without
interpretation and part of a private prayer life. (The flesh rejoices in the wasted time and
effort of praying in tongues because it lacks the true communion with God and
glories in self.)
For
those who encourage so many to speak in tongues, they must ask if tongues are
so important then why is it that Paul states he “would rather speak five words with understanding, … then ten thousand
words in a tongue” (v. 19)? Paul
expresses that prophecy is better then tongues because it is in a common
language and can edify the whole church.
Does speaking in tongues during private prayer edify? Yes, in a way. It edifies the self, that is, the flesh, in
believing oneself to be more spiritual.
Paul addresses this issue in the Corinthian church. That is why Paul explains that spiritual
gifts are not for private use. They are
for edifying of the church, not self.
Nowhere in Scripture is self edification or selfishness encouraged!
Paul
moves on to compare tongues with music.
Instruments have a distinct sound so that they can be understood,
otherwise it is just noise. Music must
be interpreted to be useful. It is the
same with tongues. If it is not interpreted,
it is noise. How would an army know what
to do in battle if the trumpet could not be interpreted?
Tongues
cannot edify the church, which is the purpose, if they are not
interpreted. Paul shows that there is no
profit in an unknown tongue. Furthermore,
Paul states that the purpose of tongues was for a sign to the unbeliever
to believe the message of God not for the believer. The way we see this gift of tongues or
languages used in Acts 2 is that the believers spoke a language unknown prior to
the speaker, but known to the unbelieving hearer. The purpose of tongues with interpretation is
for the edification of the church body, not to show the spiritual maturity of
an individual. Spiritual gifts are not
the measure of one’s level of maturity or spirituality, love is.
The
current Charismatic movement views the speaking in tongues as a priority for
all believers, placing the greatest importance upon it as a test of
spirituality. However, the Scriptures
are clear that this modern phenomenon of speaking in tongues is the same that
Paul had to correct in the Corinthian church.
It is a clear misuse of the purpose of tongues. The purpose was for the edification of the
church, not self, in a time when the Bible was not completed. It was not a sign of spirituality. There should be a diversity of spiritual
gifts among the church to the purpose of edifying the church. It is very clear that God would not have
tongues as a priority for the believer.
The priority for every Christian is love.