The Sovereignty of God in Missions
Romans 9-10
Andrew R. Rappaport
3rd
There
is a need to discuss the sovereignty of God in missions today, because it is so
ignored in many of our churches. The doctrine
of God’s sovereignty is avoided because many desire to avoid topics that seem
controversial; like sin, God’s wrath and the sovereignty of God. Many churches would rather bow to marketing
techniques and the ability of man to work on the emotions of others. Too many pastors have forgotten that it is
not their church, it is God’s church. It
is God who brings the people into the family of God and not man’s creative
promotion. It is for this purpose that
we should look at God’s sovereignty in missions, specifically in the act of
salvation.
Why
is the doctrine of God’s sovereignty a difficult doctrine for people to
accept? Because if God is sovereign that
means that man is not. We desire
sovereignty for ourselves. That was why
Adam fell in the Garden of Eden. That is
why today men teach that we evolved from moneys, to eliminate God and set
themselves up in His place. Man wants
full control over his life. The problem
is so does God. The reality is that only
One has the proper authority for that sovereignty and that is God. However, we keep fighting to take it. People do not like the doctrine of God’s
sovereignty because it means we must submit to God, not God to man.
This
message will focus specifically on the view of God’s sovereignty in the area of
salvation, which is at the heart of missions.
The following question that gets asked when discussing God’s sovereignty
in salvation is, what is man’s responsibility or does man not have any. Many believe that God’s sovereignty and man’s
responsibility cannot coexist. As if it
must be one or the other. Are these two
mutually exclusive?
I
will attempt to answer and clarify thousand of years of debate, if you allow me
to avoid labels and listen to my definition of terms. Please do not assume you know what I believe
and put me into some theological box.
Listen closely and you may just find that you will agree with me. Many debate but few listen. Please do not label me. At least, do not label me until I
finish. Labels are good if all agree on
the definitions of the labels. However,
on this subject many do not agree on the definitions, instead many labels are
used to separate the body of Christ in areas where there should really be
unity. This message is attempt to bring
unity to a divided Christian community, because the sovereignty of God is a
doctrine that should unite Christians not divide.
Some
may argue that Romans 9 is not discussing God’s personal election of men, but
instead God’s sovereign election of the nation of
Paul
is making the argument that people are not a child of God just because they are
born of the lineage of Abraham. A child
of God is one who has faith in God (v. 8).
Abraham had at least eight children, named in the Bible (Genesis
25:2). Therefore, Isaac could not claim
to be the only born son of Abraham. Yet,
Isaac was not even the first-born son of Abraham. Ishmael was the first-born. Paul’s argument of God’s sovereignty in election
is that the promise did not come from the first-born son but instead the son of
the promise the second born son.
Some
may argue that Isaac is the right heir of Abraham and not Ishmael, because
Ishmael was born of a concubine and not a wife.
Therefore, God through Paul makes the point clearer. God not only choose the second son with
Abraham, but also with Isaac (vs. 10-13).
God elected Jacob and not Esau.
Jacob and Esau were twins, but Esau was the first-born. In the local customs of the time Esau, even
though he was a twin, would have the full rights of the heir. However, before either of these two boys were
even born God elected one and not the other.
Paul make this very clear by stating that God told Rebecca, “The older shall serve the younger” (v.
12). Verse 11 states the reason God had
for this decision, “for the children not yet being born, nor
having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election
might stand, not of works but of Him who calls”. Paul says it was for this purpose that God’s
election might stand not of Jacob’s works but God’s calling. The choice of Jacob over Esau was God’s
choosing.
If
we understand what Paul is saying then we chould be
asking the question as Paul states in verse 14, “What shall we say then? Is
there unrighteousness with God? Certainly not!”. Clearly if salvation is completely the
election of God and He chooses one person over another this is the question
many ask. Paul knows that to man this
statement seems unjust. “It’s not fair!”,
some would say.
However,
Paul will prove that it is fair and God is not unjust. This is crucial to understanding the
sovereignty of God. If we do not take
the time to understand Paul’s argument we will create our own views of God,
where He is not sovereign but we ultimately are.
The one thing that MUST be
remembered in discussing God’s sovereignty is that God is God. I know it sounds simple but think about
it. It is God who formed the universe. It is God who made everything out of
nothing. It is God who made the
earth. It is God who gives life. It is God who shows mercy and compassion on
who He chooses (v. 15). We cannot
separate the fact that God as God has the right and the authority to create His
creation any way He wants. The universe
is His to control and so are we. God
formed everything out of nothing from the smallest element of an atom to the
entirety of the universe. Not one piece
of it is outside God’s control. If there
is one atom in the entire universe that is outside God’s control then He is not
sovereign. Nothing is outside His
control.
Verse 16 says, “So then it is not of him who wills, nor of
him who runs, but of God who shows mercy”.
Paul goes so far as to state
that God not only is righteous in electing some for mercy, but He is righteous
in hardening the heart of others, like the Pharaoh of Egypt during the time of
Moses. This may seem hard to understand,
but if one does not understand what God through Paul is stating here, they will
never properly understand God’s sovereignty.
We need to start in the beginning.
Due
to Adam’s sin in the Garden of Eden of attempting to become the sovereign of
the world, humanity has fallen. This
fall has cause ALL of humanity to be conceived with a sinful nature, whether we
like it or not. The sinful nature of man
means that we ALL sin and are sinners.
Therefore, we are ALL under the judgment of God. Every person born into this world starts out
evil and is destined for judgment and hell.
The reason people would ask Paul if God is unjust is because they
believe that they are naturally good, or at best neutral toward God. However, we are God’s enemies (Romans 1:30;
8:7; James 4:4). Every person’s starting
point in life is not Heaven, its Hell.
Therefore, it is not God’s justice that should be questioned when we
discuss His election, but His mercy.
That is why Paul quotes from the Old Testament to say that God has the
right to show mercy on whomever He wants.
God does not damn people to Hell, they are already on their way there
the second they are conceived. The fact
that God shows mercy on anyone is the amazing thing. We should ask how can God show mercy on
sinners, not question His justice, as if He is somehow obligated to show mercy
on all people.
If you have followed with me you should be asking, as Paul expects to be
asked, “You will say to me then, ‘Why
does [God] still find fault? For who has resisted His will?’” (v. 19).
If God is the One to show mercy and it is completely His decision, then
how can people be held responsible?
After all, no one can resist God’s will.
That is the thought. Many people
stumble over this thought. Most people
end up in one of two outcomes from this passage. Either salvation is all of God and man has no
responsibility or it is ultimately man’s choice and God has no
responsibility. Want the answer? Wait until chapter 10. First, we must build the foundation of the
argument as Paul does. No jumping to the
end of the book to see “who dun nit”.
In short the answer to the questions of verse 19 are answered in verse
20. As Job had to find out the hard way,
God does not have to answer man, but man has to answer God. Who is man that God is required to submit to
his thoughts and desires. God’s ways are
not our ways and God’s thoughts are above our thoughts.
God’s sovereignty in salvation is because God is the creator of man and
like a potter He can make the vessel for whatever purpose He has for the
vessel. Many ask how can God choose to
save some and not others. Somehow,
people think that God is required to saved all people or none. Then again, no one seems to think that none
is an option, so they say that either God must save all people or at least give
each person an equal “chance” of being saved, therefore, it must be man’s
choice and not God’s. So the thinking
goes like this, if the choice in salvation is God’s then He must choose all
people to be fair, but if the choice is man’s then God is fair. The problem with this thinking is that God’s
glory is also shown in the vessels made for wrath, by virtue of those that He
show mercy.
Notice the vessels for mercy are “prepared
beforehand for glory”, but he “vessels
of wrath” are “prepared for
destruction”. Those vessels of wrath
are already on their way to destruction.
It is only those vessels of mercy that had to be prepared “beforehand”. It is not that God desires for people to be
destroyed, but that He is longsuffering with them (2 Peter 3:9). In fact, verse 22 states that God created
them that He would have to suffer long with them.
A jeweller presents bright, clear diamonds on a black velvet background
to display the contrast; it is this contrast that reveals the beauty of the
diamonds. So it is with God’s mercy. God’s mercy is displayed best when contrasted
against His wrath. Therefore, He
prepares some vessels for wrath, while others for mercy.
Many people question the basis of God’s election. If God does elect some for mercy, then how
does He choose? Some say it must be
based on the works of men, but verse 11, along with many other passages,
clearly states that it was not of works (Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:5). Others will state that if God’s election is
not based on man’s works then it must be that God’s choice is based on man’s
choice for God. However, that is not
what this passage states. This passage
clearly states that God does the choosing not based on anything that man has
done. So what is the basis of God’s
election? It is simply this: God’s
election is basis on God’s glory and God’s glory alone. The purpose of God’s election is to display
His mercy.
Salvation is for God to show His mercy.
It is not for man. It is not
about man, it is about God!
If God sent all men to Hell, there would be no display of His
mercy. Therefore, He has shown mercy on
whom He wills. It is because God, as the
sovereign of the universe, has the right and the authority to elect some to
mercy. There is no way to understand God’s
election to mercy unless we understand God’s sovereignty. That is Paul’s whole basis of his argument in
this passage. God is sovereign and can
do what ever He wills and does not have to answer to man, angels or anything
else for His decisions, because He is sovereign.
Do we really believe in God’s sovereignty? Is God only sovereign only in salvation and
the displaying of mercy? How does God's
sovereignty work out in daily life? We
in our flesh a desire to control, but it is God who controls. Do we submit to His sovereignty or do we
fight Him for sovereignty? How does
God’s sovereignty look practically?
Let us look that a couple of examples.
Let us start with prayer. Oh but
wait, if God is sovereign then He does not need me to pray to Him and make
requests. After all He is
sovereign. Is that a right attitude
toward God’s commandments? If God is
sovereign then He has the right to choose not only the results but also the
means. God desires not only to display
His mercy in us but also to hear from His children in prayer for the purpose of
fellowship. Not that He needs us but He
knows we need Him.
Another example is our tongue.
How do we speak to and about one another? Do we look like children of God in our
speech? How often do Christians talk
about other Christians with the intent of harm, like gossip or belittling? Should we praise ourselves over God? We should seek no other purpose then to
praise God in our speech.
At this point, some may say
that I sound like a hyper-Calvinist.
However, I like Paul, am providing salvation from God’s view. The reason this issue is so difficult to
understand is because people think that only one action cause a single
reaction. In other words, either God’s
chooses or man chooses. It cannot be
both. Well, let us do a little study
into another doctrine before we proceed to Romans chapter 10, to better
understand the character of God.
Most Christians would agree in
the doctrine of inspiration. This
doctrine teaches that God used men to write the Bible, that men like Paul, used
their own words not dictated by God.
However, we call it the Word of God and rightfully so. For it is God’s Word in every sense. Paul wrote Romans, yet God superintended each
letter so that every word in its original writing was without error or
flaw. Superintended means that the inscripturation of God’s Word was by the control and
guidance of the Holy Spirit (2 Peter 1:20-21).
It was supernatural. It was a
heightening of man’s abilities and sensibilities.
The result was that God wrote
the book of Romans and we can also say that Paul wrote the book of Romans. Both are the single author of the book of
Romans. Most Christians agree with this
statement when it comes to the doctrine of inspiration. So let us summarize it. God worked through men to write in their
words to create the Bible yet the Holy Spirit controlled every letter so that
it was written exactly as God intended it to be written.
The doctrine of inspiration
teaches us that God works through people so that the choices they make are
God’s choices. No, that cannot be you
say. You need an example from the
Bible. Well, turn to Genesis and look at
the life of Joseph. His brothers sold
him as a slave and he rises to the head of the Egyptian Empire. When his father dies, the brothers are
fearful for their lives, but Joseph recognizes that what they did they meant
for evil but it was all part of God’s plan and He meant it for good. So, God works through people to make the
choices that He desires, but it is still man’s responsibility for his
choices.
Now let us carry that over to
the doctrine of salvation and the discussion of the sovereignty of God and the
responsibility of man. There is a good
reason why God places Romans chapter 10 after Romans chapter 9. That was to prevent much of the debate that
too many Christians spend their time arguing over.
You see the struggle over this
doctrine is a struggle over our theological understanding and our
experience. We have just seen that
theologically it is God and God alone who elects to show mercy on whomever He
chooses. However, when you and I got
saved, what did we experience. We
remember someone presenting the gospel to us and we believed. Therefore, experientially we remember our
choosing God. So, the debate who choose
who, is really an issue of our theological understanding versus our
experience. However, they do not have to
be mutually exclusive. One does not have
to happen before the other. So, did God
chose you or did you chose God.
Well, based on Romans chapter
9 I think we would all, if we are honest with the text, say that God chose
us. However, now let us look at Romans
chapter 10.
Romans 10:9-10 clearly state
that if we confessed and believed we will be saved. Our salvation was based on our confession and
belief. It does not matter if you are a
Jew or Gentile, anyone who confesses with their mouth the Lord Jesus Christ and
believes in their heart that God raised Him from the died will be saved. That sounds like we choose God.
The argument is often made
that “whosoever” means, WHO-SO-EVER.
Anyone who calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved. And the arguments begin, but what if they are
not one of the elect. Whosoever means
whosoever. But they cannot believe
unless God first changes their heart to believe. Whosoever means whosoever. But they are enemies of God and cannot chose
Him. Whosoever means whosoever. We can come up with many, many arguments, but
this text is very clear, “whosoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be
saved”.
Now let us deal with one of
the major arguments against this text.
It is the view that man cannot believe in God until God regenerates the
man and changes his heart to be able to believe in God. Not only does this passage teach against that
view but also it leads to one of two dangerous teachings that many do not
realize. If God must regenerate a person
to be able to believe then you have put a time gap between regeneration and
belief. You now have the problem that if
someone is not saved until they believe and that person must be regenerated
first then they can be regenerated and yet not be saved. Thus, you can be a regenerated unbeliever,
and this cannot happen even if it is for a split second. No one can be a regenerated unbeliever. However, if you error on the other side of
man choosing God, now you have an unregenerate believer. Again, you have the same problem.
So what is the answer? Well let us go back to what we said about the
doctrine of inspiration. We have already
seen that the Holy Spirit works through men to do what God wills, though it is
completely their own willful acts. Note I did not say free will, because no one
prior to salvation has a free will. We
are all influenced by sin; therefore, until salvation our will is not free. It is bound by sin.
Many also neglect one of the
ministries of the Holy Spirit, His convicting work in the heart of
unbelievers. The Holy Spirit convicts
the unbeliever of sin and works through the person to confess in Christ and
believe. It is the same dual actors as
in the doctrine of inspiration with a single result. Theologically God chose you. Experiencurally you
chose God. Both are taught one in Romans
chapter 9 and the other in Romans chapter 10.
Therefore, when we discuss the
doctrine of God’s Sovereignty in salvation we see that man does have a
responsibility and yet it is God’s election.
Regeneration and man’s belief are a simultaneous work of the Holy
Spirit. One does not happen without the
other. God elected outside of time and
worked through us, by convicting of our sin that we would confess and
believe.
Now for those that are still
confused and are convinced that they must be able to understand these two
elements of salvation completely, there is one more Scripture that will completely
answer this debate. It is Deuteronomy
29:29. It says, “The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but those things which
are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the
words of this law”. In other words,
it is not for us to know everything about God but that which He has revealed to
us we have a responsibility to teach others.
God is greater then us and His ways are not our ways, therefore we are
not expected to understand everything of God.
If you cannot fully comprehend how God can elect us apart from our
choosing and yet we choose God, then that is fine. You do not have to understand it fully, know
that God has taught it and teach it as He has revealed it to us through
Paul.
God has given us a deposit of
truth in the Scriptures and we are responsible for the dispensing of that truth
as God sees fit. We want to be involved
in missions and that is about people coming to faith. Well verse 17 says, “faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God”. We are responsible to study the Word of God
for the hearing of those that need faith.
So what is our responsibility
as Christians? God has already shown His
mercy on us and we believe in Him. Now
what? Verses 13-15 answer this
question. We read: “For ‘whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.’ How then shall they call on Him in whom they
have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not
heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach
unless they are sent?” It is our
responsibility to go out with the Word of God to those unbelievers that we work
with, live with, hang out with or are in our families.
This is what I call the
“missions ladder”. The saved are called
and the called will believe because they hear what someone preached because
they were sent and it is those are called that are sent to preach so that
others will hear and believe because they too were called.

Therefore, we should not be
wasting valuable time debating over God’s sovereignty versus man’s
responsibility dividing the God’s children.
Both are taught and if we cannot understand how they related together
completely, fine. Our responsibility as
Christians is to go and preach the Word of God to those who will hear and
believe so that they may call upon the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. And you know what, if then call upon the name
of the Lord, then you know that they are God’s elect.
Some people feel that since God is sovereign and He chooses they do not need to share the gospel with others. However, God’s says, “how will they hear without a preacher?”. Others state that if it is all of God then they will sit back and wait for God to save them, but until then they will enjoy their sinful life, since it is not their choice. To any who are not saved God is calling you to repentance. To those who are saved God is sending you to preach the gospel so that many will hear and some will believe, because they called and will be saved. Let us not fight of the doctrine of God’s sovereignty, but unite around what God has revealed to reach a lost and dying world.